Would they have a better life in the wild? Safety and security for animals, which they may not otherwise have in the wild, are provided. Do they really help preserve endangered species or it is more a business and a cruel source of entertainment? In conclusion, it seems that keeping wild animals in zoos is more benefical than harmful. They is certainly true among elephants that need to travel long distances as natural way of living. Not one of today's children has ever seen a dinosaur, yet kids are crazy about them. There are continuous cases of animals and zoo workers. Conclusion Animals don't only lose their freedom by being kept in zoos but also their socialization with the other animals.
As what we know, these animals are still hunted by poachers for their skins, bones and other by-products. There are many advantages for keeping animals in zoo, including our entertainment. Zoos are the equivalent of a paradise retreat. Animals are not humans and some forget this issue. People do not kill them.
But at the same time, existence of zoos is also very important from educational point of view. With reforms brought about in this sector, animals are given a much better treatment today. Disadvantages of Zoos One of the biggest disadvantages to animals in zoos is that they start to lose some of their natural instincts and abilities. Poachers will often hunt animals for their fur, feathers, or — more specifically — elephants for the ivory from their tusks. However Some people state that being kept in zoos is cruel because animals need freedom and a lot of space. In the case of zoos, both sides will argue that their side saves animals. At the Alaska Zoo, an elephant named Maggie was confined to a 146 square meter 1600-square foot barn during the winter.
Zoos are in fact, trying to make people aware of their ecology. For a long time, zoo authorities claimed to have contributed to the conservation of endangered animal species; however with animal rights organizations becoming vocal on the issue of abuse of zoo animals, people are beginning to understand how zoos actually function. In the wild, these individuals might have trouble finding mates and breeding. In fact, zoo animals are starting to get the treatment of kings, given that they are the livelihood of the business. Zoo authorities do admit that the functioning of zoos is not flawless, and that captive animals do suffer from problems; however, they also expect people to appreciate the sincere efforts taken by them to protect and preserve wild animals. Sune Geldenhuys 11H G5 There is a significant positive correlation between perceived fear and strangeness of a range of animals and insects, even when the effects of perceived harmfulness have been controlled for. While these establishments are really trying to do their best to let animals mate, their offspring are normally kept at the same zoo or simply moved to another one, which does nothing for the numbers of the species in the wild.
There are Safari Parks and large zoos in which animals have more space and live in an enviroment slightly more similar to their natural habitat. Learn about the pros and cons of zoos and join our debate and poll: Should there be zoos? If we look at how animals are being hunted right now, we can see how zoos are great for them. Captive breeding programs are implemented to help preserve animals that have decreased in number, which is a good way to prevent extinction of some species. Zoos have more visitors than the combined attendance of the four major sports leagues , , and. This issue is indirectly related to environmental problems and is the source of heated debates taking place the world over.
He holds a Bachelor of Science in mass communications from Middle Tennessee State University. In zoos, the endangered species are protected. One of them is the confined spaces where the animals are forced to live in. You can also visit there with your guests from another city or country. Hence, the conditions of the zoos should be upgraded to such an extent that animals feel happy, comfortable and as close to their natural habitat as possible.
Let us weigh the pros and cons of this issue, which seems to be on the rise. People can get familiar with animals education, information and knowledge. They forced their energy through those banal movements in the small available space, … like constant tours of the cage. Not all animal rights activists love animals. Landmarks The city of Washington, D.
With reforms being brought about in this sector, animals are provided with proper diet and enough space. But while we admire these animals, many of us are not aware of the circumstances these caged animals face, thus making the matter a hot subject of debates over the years. Hollywood, Santa Monica, Venice Beach, Long Beach, Downtown. In the zoos they get much less space for themselves in comparison to what they would get if they had been in their natural habitat. The people and activists who oppose the very idea of setting up zoos argue that even if zoo owners take sincere efforts to conserve wild animals, success attained in protecting them is insignificant. This includes programs that will one day re-introduce some of the animals within the zoo back into the wild.
There are far less diverse plant and animal interactions, if any at all, and this can lead to extreme boredom and loneliness for the animals. The original home was burned by the British in. An increasing number of animal rights advocates and animal protection organizations are questioning the role of zoos in modern societies. In the wild, these individuals might have trouble finding mates and breeding. Surrounding the exhibits, zoos usually have information describing the animal, its history and natural location. There are some that offer better programs than others and some animals simply thrive in conservation areas better than they do in the wild.