Writing an argumentative essay requires you to defend a position for which there is more than one side. Use a mix of evidence, from statistics to other studies and anecdotal stories. Reserve them for later in your essay when you can explain them. You can get the reader's attention by telling a real story about someone who committed a crime that would deserve the death penalty. If you are the defense, you may want to point out any weaknesses in the evidence, trying to demonstrate that the prosecution did not meet the burden of proof. They make compelling and persuasive statements to readers about why they should care about a particular subject or agree with the author.
The key is to have the data come from a source that is least exposed to scrutiny due to small sample sizes, faulty methodologies, or bias. This is becaus: 1 - You can't argue that somebody else argues something; it's not a debatable opinion. You can also include an emotional or logical appeal or a story to back up that final statement. Work against the opposing point of view and prove why your stance is correct. Then address how your view overcomes those objections.
You're only introducing your argument, not debating it. Here is help on writing a thesis: You can bring your reader into your argument by stating questions that your reader might have and then answering those questions. It is okay to acknowledge how the other side feels, but you want to keep your own point of view intact. Then at the end of the story ask your question. There should be a good mix of bodies of evidence supporting each main point, and every main point should point back to your overall thesis. To make sure that everyone in the jury understands your closing argument, also avoid technical or legal terms.
Use the strongest, most logical points of your argument to structure the conclusion so that you have the best chance of convincing the reader of the validity of your position. Many thanks for this very helpful article about argument essay. Then continue to reference the theory throughout the rest of the argument. Copyright 1999, Gordon Harvey adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy , for the Writing Center at Harvard University. Here is a classic example: Or, in other words: the truth of the premises is supposed to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Although it can be appropriate to jump back and forth between tenses throughout a paper, it should not occur in the middle of a paragraph about only one topic. Alexander Peterman is a Private Tutor in Florida.
How to differentiate a strong argument from week Strong arguments The essay form of a strong argument always begins with opinions and facts about the subject. Readers want the merits of your point, not simply a tearing down of the views of others. You might explain how much waste recycling helps avoid, for instance, based on facts you presented in the paper. If you have time, it might be interesting to try some of those solutions. Also try to avoid rude, hostile, or deprecating language when addressing counterpoints; this tactic can easily result in the audience that you most care about those who disagree with you ignoring your argument due to adverse emotional reaction. This will help you feel more organized, and will minimize the risk of forgetting key facts.
A well-rounded, fair counter argument can often win a challenging debate or argument. You must be able to back up your statements with facts, statistics, examples, and informed opinions from experts. Tenses are crucial in this type of writing. Identify any false assumptions your opponent is likely to use so that they are easy to spot during a debate. Allow your structure to clarify the flow of your argument — set out the most important or pertinent points first, followed by further details, and reserving more unusual ideas or final thoughts for later on. After sitting through a trial, many jurors have heard and seen a huge amount of information.
You won't be making an argument for why you're correct—just that there are also situations in which your points can be valid. The Pyramid of Disagreement: A Critical Tool for Analyzing Arguments When confronted with an idea, proposition, or any content with which one disagrees, several responses are possible. Another quality of a good debate question is it has to be something that people care about. It is not really like having an argument or fighting with someone. When an academic has made a claim in a book or paper, always question it. If what you say is anything different than the topic of your paper, then you need to shift it some. Bring that theory to the jury again, and remind them that it was established at the beginning of the trial.
She follows the four elements of an argumentative essay as I described above. Also, be sure to include to start off your paper. Agree or disagree with reasons. Given this definition, it seems unusual that you would want to prepare an argument that rebuts your own thesis. Use sources that are varied and have merit with your reader.