For a juvenile case to be transferred to an adult criminal court, it has to be eligible for a waiver. I once attended the sentencing of a teenager — Clarence — who had killed a woman — Pauline — who sang in my choir. Just because a child commits a crime does not mean that the crime is not committed, it does not mean that the victim didn't suffer. By allowing them to be tried as adults, you give them the ability to have a trial by jury. Whereas in a juvenile court, offenders are given curfews, put under house arrest or sent to counseling. An important cause of the onset of serious violent behavior is involvement in a delinquent peer group. Imagine your most dearest and most cherished person being killed or raped by a juvenile.
Williams' attorney says it is difficult to predict whether the young offender would commit another violent crime in the future, but that he should have gone through all other court-ordered programs available to teenagers before being charged as an adult. We have to redesign the youthful-offender codes. Adolescent brains are not fully developed until at least the age of 20. Old today than they were at 10yrs. One, their educational and employment prospects become significantly worse, thus giving them incentive and opportunity to commit crimes, and two, the stigma that they face might lead to an inability to adjust in society and may cause for repeated criminal behavior. But that doesn't mean they don't know what they did was wrong.
What do you have to say? They need to put somewhere or locked up somewhere because they need some kind of treatment so that they can get the help they need. At this age, a child is no longer a child and can be considered an adult. The formation of gangs probably is related to inmates' need for protection from other inmates. Quite the contrary, I submit. Because this is the case, we can't talk about the rights or privileges an adult holds. This, they say, does not serve any purpose, because this in no way guarantees that no crimes will be committed henceforth.
It is believed that when children as young as 10-12 years of age commit a crime, they do not necessarily grow up to become criminals; yet when they are punished in the same manner as adults, the odds of this could somehow change. Certainly typical minors, especially quite young children, although they have some inchoate concept of right and wrong, lack the developed faculties and mature conscience of an adult and don't yet possess the ability to fully comprehend and appreciate the full extent of the badness of their bad behavior. Therefore, having them tried as adults would result in a pointless case. We are dumb and do things out of the ordinary, and putting us in a place where there is hate, rape, murder, and very dangerous people will just make us into something even worse. Moving on to their second contention, which talks about how rehabilitation is more effective than a traditional trial. A political conception of justice that could not fulfill this public role must be, it seems, in some way seriously defective.
An example spanning both classes was 16-year-old plot to murder her parents and pin the crime on an intruder. They tell us we must allow these criminals — these violent felons — to be given understanding and a second chance. Many experts believe abolishing the juvenile court will only make matters worse. Minors should be charged as adults. This is the exact attitude which leads to the question of whether the whole juvenile system should be discarded to include only the one judicial system of criminal courts, which tries both children and adults under the same law, with the same rules. Victims and the families of victims still deserve a sense of justice if one of their family members is affected or even killed by a juvenile offender. When a juvenile is sent to prison as an adult they do not get any help to rehabilitate and the possibilities of what they learned in prison they will bring back with them when they get out and will commit a crime again.
All this for little or no payoff: Increased transfer has never been shown to reduce juvenile crime. Because we must judge an action by its result, the manipulation of words during a testimony should be largely disregarded. I mean after all; This is America. In juvenile court, this is not the case. I understand that as a teenager, one is bound to make mistakes. If there was a 17 year old in court yes he probably should be tried as an adult but does he have the right to buy tobacco, alcohol, or vote? On most occasions, you'll find that the kids who have committed a crime are very young -- as young as 9 and 10.
Psychologists say that as his age progresses, he will have very little recollection of the details of the crime that he committed and the remorse that he felt then. Having robbed and bound the victim showed a plan that the two juveniles created because they had the materials to bind the woman and the idea to rob her of possessions before killing her. Rehabilitation is more possible in an environment that is conducive to education, where young prisoners can gain insight into their behavior to produce a positive transformation. A parent must take the time to teach a child right from wrong and how to handle their responsibilities. Con My first contention, juveniles may be able to defend themselves but are not completely familiar with how the law works and the consequences that comes with their actions.
Like many states, California allows youth offenders as young as 14 to be transferred from the juvenile system to adult courts. How can rehabilitation be possible in such a dangerous environment? According to the Office of Justice Programs, the number of juvenile arrests made in 2012 is over 1 million, which may be alarming but is actually 37% less than the arrests made in 2003. In Wisconsin, however, any juvenile over the age of 10 who is charged with homicide or attempted homicide will be automatically tried as adults, which makes the debate moot and academic. These young offenders may no right from wrong, but they are unable to process the long term affects of their decisions. Every parent knows that punishing a child of 15 and a child of 5 won't be carried out in the same manner. The dead were clerk Osman Jama Elmi, 28; his cousin, Mohamed Abdi Warfa, 30; and customer Anwar Salah Mohammed, 31.