Pros and cons of paying college athletes. Should College Athletes Be Paid? 2019-02-01

Pros and cons of paying college athletes Rating: 6,5/10 220 reviews

What Are the Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes?

pros and cons of paying college athletes

But it will probably take a small change to federal antitrust law to make something like a universal limit on coach pay possible. A pure athlete plays the game simply because he loves it. Professionalizing college sports by paying athletes money will cause more problems in the long run. Its programs might experience budget problems. Again, they bring in that money for the school, which means the money they make is distributed throughout the school and not meant to be money athletes get paid with, star athlete or not.

Next

12 Primary Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

pros and cons of paying college athletes

It happens in art, music, theater, journalism, and other areas all the time. People do believe that the players deserve compensation for the revenue they bring in. Conclusion There is a lot of variables to consider when it comes to paying college athletes for playing sports. This means that if the N. I also believe it would take away from the pride and spirit of a college if the athletes were playing for a paycheck rather than that win that makes their school proud.

Next

Cons

pros and cons of paying college athletes

College sports have already become huge, with thousands of people lining up to watch their favorite student athletes and teams play. Arguments against paying students also include that doing so favors traditional money-earning sports, such as basketball and football, and may not compensate men and women equally. After all, they would owe taxes on those earnings. Over the past couple of years there have been numerous arguments over whether college athletes should be paid or not. There are far too many serious questions to answer for me to jump on the pay-college-athletes bandwagon.

Next

Should College Athletes be Paid?

pros and cons of paying college athletes

The money is put back into the school, which aids in advancing the campus, lowering tuition, and improving the school overall. Is it just in revenue-producing sports? Thousands upon thousands of bright, academically gifted students never receive those perks even though they are just as deserving. Such insurance is simply a recognition that an individual who suffers an injury while working to benefit the institution should not suffer economically as a result of that injury. But if athletes get paid like employed workers, they'll be free to make poor decisions with their money, which could negatively impact their future well-being. While the graph displays the amount of revenue for Division I Football and Basketball Programs received, the graph does not state when these statistics took place. It gives student athletes a much-needed income. I belong in the group that disagrees and It looks like I have a lot of competition looking at the group that agrees.

Next

What Are the Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes?

pros and cons of paying college athletes

But student athletes aren't paid any salaries or bonuses, even when their teams perform well and generate extra revenue. However, this graph does prove that these schools wouldn't nearly have the suitable athletic department that the athletes are accustomed to having if we were to pay the players. Plus, an athlete's ability to play sports at a high level will end when he or she is still young, but the benefits of receiving a college or university education can last a lifetime. Who decides a fair yet competitive rate to pay? But they don't lose sight of their main motivations for pursuing higher education itself. When that happens, the quality of education could be diminished. They might also not have the capacity to give big paychecks and therefore lose out on talented students, who understandably want to receive the higher pay that larger schools can give. Many small colleges and universities use their earnings from college sports to balance their budgets and be financially on track.

Next

Should College Athletes Get Paid? Here Are The Pros And Cons

pros and cons of paying college athletes

With the pay they can get, they do not have to borrow that big amount of money to get through school. An open-market pay system would clash with such provisions. These scholarships can cover a number of different items, such as tuition fees, room and board and course-related books. This practice appears to make eminently good sense. They push past their limits constantly. Coupled with creating fair standards for compensation, education should be prioritized for these college athletes.

Next

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Yes, But Not How You Think

pros and cons of paying college athletes

As stated earlier, 62 percent of sports fans are less likely to watch or attend sporting events if popular players are paid more than non-popular players. This is why the question of whether college athletes need to be compensated by their schools or not has been around for years now. College sports have changed and maybe the way athletes are treated should be changed as well. Also, those who are gaining more game time and scoring more points would be arguing for higher wages than their teammates. Attract more talent Why put your life on the line for something that pays nothing? So they think that student athletes just need to work hard and remain patient for their future rewards. It is important to recognize the distinctions between Points 2 and 3 above so that business norms can be observed in the context of Point 2.

Next

College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons

pros and cons of paying college athletes

Student athletes already receive free education, meals, and housing for playing the game they love, while you got non-student athletes being full time students and working a full time job through the late hours of the night while still coming out in debt. This could put the school in a bad spot financially, as well as single out players who do not perform as well as others by paying them less. It is impossible for them to work during the school year, so the opportunity to generate an income is negligible. But maybe the answer lies somewhere in the middle. While many agree that athletes deserve some sort of stipend, other believe that money takes away the value behind amateurism. It is virtually impossible to have a payment scale across the board.

Next

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

pros and cons of paying college athletes

Scholarship grants can only attract so much. He also recounted how these criticisms have been overcome in a way consistent with the academic mission. It can make other students feel upset. Some players come from a bad poor family and scholarships can pay for school but what about the trips the take for away games, what about the extras like food and clothes? But even if the Nebraska governor signs the bill into law, that doesn't mean it would be enacted, because the bill stipulates that it wouldn't go into effect until at least three other states with schools in the Big 12 pass similar laws. A Possible Solution All kinds of ideas have been floated for addressing the heated issue of college athlete compensation.

Next